Skip to main content

The Science of Aging: How Facial Ligaments Influence Sagging and Jawline Definition

February 1, 2026
Contact Us
A sharp jawline isn’t just an aesthetic ideal—it’s the visible result of how skin, fat, fascia, ligaments, and bone work together. With time, that system loses tension and volume. Faces shift from youthful “ovals” to squarer, bottom-heavy shapes. At the center of this change are the facial retaining ligaments—fiber-rich tethers that lock soft tissue to deeper fascia and bone. Understand how those ligaments age (and how they interact with everything around them), and suddenly it’s clear why jowls show up, why the pre-jowl sulcus deepens, and why some treatments reliably bring back definition while others disappoint.
 
What follows is a practical, clinically minded tour through the anatomy, biomechanics, evaluation, and treatment strategies that drive jawline aging—and rejuvenation.
Contact Us

Anatomy of Facial Retaining Ligaments and Supporting Structures

Key retaining ligaments

Retaining ligaments act like anchor points for the mobile facial envelope. For midface and lower-face contour, the big players are:
  • Zygomatic ligament complex: Osteocutaneous fibers running along the zygomatic body and arch, crossing the SMAS into the dermis. They help keep the cheek’s malar projection and shape the lid–cheek junction through their ties to the prezygomatic space and SOOF (sub–orbicularis oculi fat).
  • Masseteric cutaneous ligaments: Dense fibrous septa over the masseter and parotid–masseteric fascia. They steady the lateral cheek and influence lateral jawline definition and the parotid transition.
  • Mandibular retaining (cutaneous) ligament: An osteocutaneous tether along the mandibular body, typically near the labiomandibular fold (marionette line). Together with nearby septa, it helps carve out the pre-jowl sulcus by setting a firm anchor next to heavier, settling tissue just lateral to it.
  • Orbicularis retaining ligament (ORL): A circumferential tether at the orbital rim that secures lower eyelid tissues to periosteum. While periorbital, it perfectly illustrates how fixed tethers create “valleys” alongside descending “hills”—the same pattern later seen along the jawline.
These aren’t uniform “ropes.” They’re zones of condensed fibrous tissue woven through the SMAS and fascia—density and connections vary from person to person, which is why sagging doesn’t look the same in everyone.

SMAS, superficial fat compartments, and deep fat pads

The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is a continuous fibromuscular layer linking the platysma below to the temporoparietal fascia above. It envelops the mimetic muscles, transmits their pull to the skin, and serves as the insertion bed for ligaments.
  • Superficial fat compartments: Arranged in distinct units (medial and middle cheek fat, nasolabial fat, jowl fat, lateral temporal–cheek fat) separated by septa. They deflate and move unevenly with age, which creates contrast and shadow.
  • Deep fat pads: Deep medial cheek fat (DMCF), SOOF, buccal fat, and deep pre-masseteric fat. Deep pads often atrophy first—especially in the midface—undercutting support.
In short: SMAS and fat layers glide over fixed ligaments and deeper fascia. Where a mobile layer meets a tether, contours change.

Fascial planes, septa, and osteocutaneous attachments at the mandibular border

Over the lateral face and neck, the parotid–masseteric fascia and platysma form key planes. Along the mandibular edge, the mandibular septum and mandibular cutaneous ligament anchor tissue to bone. When superficial tissues (including jowl fat) descend, they produce a predictable hill-and-valley pattern:
  • Hill: Jowl fullness lateral to the mandibular ligament.
  • Valley: Pre-jowl sulcus just medial to the ligament.
  • Transition: The labiomandibular fold (marionette line), made sharper by repeated depressor activity and volume loss.
These relationships also influence the cervicomental complex—platysma, submental fat compartments, and hyoid position—all of which shape the neck–jaw connection.

Neurovascular considerations and safe zones

  • Marginal mandibular nerve: A CN VII branch often 1–2 cm below the mandibular border anteriorly (but variable). It’s especially vulnerable near the mandibular body and the anteroinferior parotid region.
  • Facial artery and vein: The artery crosses the inferior mandibular border just anterior to the masseter at the facial notch, then heads toward the nasolabial fold. The facial vein runs more posteriorly and superficially.
  • Mental nerve: Exits at the mental foramen near the second premolar, usually 1.5–2 cm above the mandibular border. Be mindful in the marionette region.
Safer technique typically favors cannulas in subdermal or periosteal planes, ultrasound guidance when available, and avoidance of bolus injections where vessels cross.
The Science of Aging
Contact Us

Biomechanics of Aging: How Ligament Laxity Drives Ptosis and Jowling

Material property changes with age

  • Collagen remodeling: Cross-linking and glycation increase stiffness but reduce functional resilience—stiff yet less “springy.”
  • Elastin degradation: Fragmentation and loss of elastin reduce elasticity, so tissues creep under constant load.
  • Dermal and SMAS changes: Thinner dermis and shifts in SMAS fiber orientation blunt efficient force transmission.

Force vectors and load transfer

The face is under nonstop load—gravity, motion, mass shifts:
  • Gravity: A constant inferomedial pull on the mid and lower face.
  • Mimetic muscle activity: Depressor anguli oris, depressor labii inferioris, and platysma tug downward at the commissure and jawline; masseter activity boosts lateral tension.
  • Fat mass redistribution: Deep fat deflates; superficial compartments descend. Stress concentrates at fixed ligament points.
As ligaments stretch and lose integrity, the mobile envelope slides over the anchors—valleys deepen, hills (jowls) grow.

Transition zones and contour disruption

Where mobile and fixed tissues meet, characteristic features appear:
  • Pre-jowl sulcus: Medial to the jowl beside the mandibular ligament—deepening as tissue descends laterally.
  • Marionette lines (labiomandibular folds): Sharpened by repeated depressor use and differential descent.
  • Hill-and-valley topography: First seen at the lid–cheek junction (ORL/SOOF), echoed along the jawline (mandibular ligament/jowl fat).

Phenotypic variability

  • Sex: Men generally have thicker dermis and stronger mandibular projection, delaying obvious jowling despite heavier tissue. Women often show earlier perioral and pre-jowl change due to thinner dermis and hormonal shifts.
  • Ethnicity and skin type: Thicker dermis and more baseline pigmentation (common in many patients of African, South Asian, or East Asian descent) can preserve surface elasticity; robust superficial fat, if lax, may still emphasize jowls.
  • Skeletal projection: Retrognathia or a recessive chin magnifies pre-jowl hollows and soft-tissue collapse. A defined gonial angle and strong chin resist descent.
  • Dental–occlusal status: Tooth loss and reduced vertical dimension shift mandibular resorption, flatten the chin, and reduce ligament support—speeding jawline aging.

Clinical Assessment: Mapping Ligament Integrity and Jawline Definition

Static and dynamic examination

  • Pinch test and snap-back: Assesses redundancy and recoil; a sluggish return points to elastin loss.
  • Vector analysis: Manually lift vertically, superolaterally, and laterally to see which direction best corrects jowls—useful for teasing out SMAS versus skin-dominant laxity.
  • Animation-driven descent: Watch jowls and marionette lines during speech, smiling, and platysma activation (grimace). Hyperactive depressors often pair with a deep pre-jowl sulcus.

Imaging adjuncts

  • High-frequency ultrasound: Maps superficial fat and facial vessels; can visualize ligament-thickening zones—helpful for safer injectables and energy-based treatments.
  • MRI: Useful in complex or revision cases to assess deep fat atrophy, buccal fat prominence, and parotid–masseteric fascia planes.
  • 3D surface scanning: Quantifies jawline straightness, gonial definition, and cervicomental angles—ideal for before–after tracking.

Fat compartment diagnosis

  • Midface descent: Loss of DMCF and SOOF support deepens the nasolabial fold and shifts load to the lower face.
  • Labiomandibular fat pad behavior: Medial pad prominence alongside jowl descent outlines the marionette line and pre-jowl sulcus.
  • Cervicomental angle: Degrades with preplatysmal fat, platysmal laxity, and submandibular gland ptosis. Submental fullness can hide the jawline regardless of ligament status.

Patient stratification

  • Skin quality: Fitzpatrick type, elastosis, pore visibility, and glycation signs (yellowish hue, stiffness).
  • BMI and soft-tissue thickness: Heavier tissue needs stronger lift or debulking; thin skin risks irregularity with overly aggressive tightening.
  • Bone resorption and occlusion: Retrognathia and dental loss push plans toward skeletal support.
  • Age, goals, and downtime tolerance: Help decide between staged nonsurgical plans and definitive surgery.
The Science of Aging

Interventions: Strategies to Counteract Ligament Laxity and Restore Contour

Non-surgical modalities

  • Energy-based tightening:
    • MFU-V/HIFU: Focused ultrasound targets fibrous septa and SMAS-level points, driving neocollagenesis over 3–6 months. Best for mild to moderate laxity with decent skin thickness.
    • Monopolar/bipolar RF and RF microneedling: Remodel the dermis and, depending on depth, lightly tighten SMAS; great for skin quality and modest lift.
  • Collagen biostimulators:
    • Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA): Build dermal and sub-dermal matrix over months. Useful for global firmness and as scaffolding in the pre-jowl and mandibular sweep.
Set expectations early: energy devices improve tightness and texture—they won’t relocate heavy jowls like surgery can.

Filler-based support

Smart filler placement can shore up weak points, fill valleys, and sharpen angles:
  • Deep periosteal bolus: Chin (pogonion) and prejowl augmentation on bone adds anterior and linear support; improves the labiomental angle and jawline continuity.
  • Ligament buttressing: Small, firm support along the mandibular ligament smooths the valley–hill transition. CaHA or high-G’ HA works well in structural planes.
  • Vector-based cannula placement: Long retrograde threads along the mandibular border—from chin to antegonial region—can even out contour. Beware the facial artery crossing near the antegonial notch and the mental foramen; stay subdermal in high-risk areas or map vessels with ultrasound.
Filler won’t “tighten” a lax ligament, but by redistributing load and lifting shadows, it makes the jawline read straighter.

Suture suspension and thread lifts

For the right candidates—good skin, mild to moderate ptosis, adequate tissue thickness—threads can help:
  • Vector planning: Usually superolateral, anchored to temporal or mastoid fascia. Capture tissue around the jowl and lower cheek, re-suspending it over fixed ligaments.
  • Endpoints and limitations: Results are immediate yet modest and time-limited (often 6–18 months). Possible issues: dimpling, visibility, asymmetry. Not a replacement for surgical release when ligaments are firm and tissues are heavy.

Surgical approaches

For significant jowls and neck laxity, surgery remains the gold standard:
  • Deep-plane facelift: Releases zygomatic and masseteric ligaments in a controlled plane, mobilizing SMAS and malar fat as a unit. Excellent for restoring midface support and lower-face definition—with natural movement.
  • SMAS plication or imbrication: Less ligament release than deep-plane but can still deliver strong jawline improvement in selected patients.
  • Platysmaplasty: Medial and/or lateral techniques refine the cervicomental angle; submental lipectomy treats preplatysmal fat. Don’t overlook submandibular gland prominence.
  • Mandibular/mentum augmentation: Chin implants, sliding genioplasty, and angle implants boost bony projection—reducing reliance on soft-tissue “camouflage” and sharpening ligament-defined contours.
  • Adjunct fat grafting: Replenishes deep midface volume, redistributes load, and smooths transitions.
The best choice depends on the mix of laxity, volume loss, skeletal deficiency, and neck anatomy.

Risk Management, Outcomes, and Patient Education

Complication avoidance

  • Nerve protection: Safeguard the marginal mandibular nerve by staying in appropriate planes during surgery and avoiding deep energy delivery or forceful cannula passes below the anterior mandibular border.
  • Vascular safety: The facial artery at the mandibular notch and the mental foramen are high-risk filler zones; consider ultrasound, inject slowly with minimal pressure, and favor cannulas.
  • Parotid–masseteric region: Watch for Stensen’s duct and the parotid tail during lateral work.
Educate patients about transient neuropraxia risks with energy devices or surgery—and the warning signs of vascular compromise with injectables.

Outcome metrics

  • Objective measures:
    • Jawline straightness index and jowl projection (mm) on standardized lateral oblique views.
    • Gonial angle and cervicomental angle (youthful is typically 105–120 degrees).
    • Dermal elasticity via cutometry or shear-wave elastography.
  • Patient-reported outcomes:
    • FACE-Q “Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline” and “Aging Appearance.”
    • GAIS at 3 and 6 months.
Standardized photographs (lighting and head position) are non-negotiable for tracking progress.

Longevity and maintenance

  • Energy-based tightening: Starts around 8–12 weeks, peaks at 3–6 months; maintenance typically 12–18 months (device and biology matter).
  • Fillers and biostimulators: HA 9–18 months; CaHA 12–18 months; PLLA 18–24 months after a full series—site and motion affect longevity.
  • Threads: About 6–18 months, depending on material and tissue thickness.
  • Surgery: Often 7–15 years of meaningful improvement, influenced by weight changes, sun exposure, and intrinsic aging.
Lifestyle matters: stable weight, UV protection, smoking cessation, bruxism management, and good dental occlusion all support a long-lasting, clean jawline.

Expectation setting

  • Age-appropriate outcomes: Aim for harmony, not a filter-flat line—too straight can look unnatural.
  • Staged plans: Layer skin quality work, volume restoration, and ligament-focused repositioning over time.
  • Informed consent: Discuss nerve injury, asymmetry, contour irregularity, vascular occlusion (with fillers), thread-related issues, and maintenance needs.
The Science of Aging

Conclusion

The jawline tells the story of facial aging. Retaining ligaments—especially the zygomatic, masseteric, mandibular, and periorbital tethers—dictate where and how descent shows up by anchoring soft tissues to deeper structures. As collagen and elastin break down and fat compartments remodel, those tethers turn mechanical load into visible “hills and valleys”: jowls, pre-jowl sulci, marionette lines. A careful assessment—static, dynamic, and image-guided—maps the mix of laxity, volume loss, and skeletal support. Treatments, from energy-based tightening and biostimulators to vector-savvy fillers, suture suspension, and deep-plane lifting with skeletal augmentation, work best when they respect this ligament-driven architecture.
 
Bottom line: match technique to anatomy, honor neurovascular safety, and plan for durability. When patients understand the “why” and the timeline, they become true partners in care—and they’re far more satisfied with results that restore not just a sharper jawline, but structural balance across the lower face and neck.
Proper incision care

Schedule Your Appointment 
with Dr. Mourad

If you are considering facial plastic surgery and want results that enhance your natural beauty without looking overdone, schedule a consultation with Dr. Moustafa Mourad today. You will receive personal, expert guidance at every step—from your first visit to your final result.
Book an Appointment

From Our Blog

Facelift and Neck Lift
February 6, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

Facelift and Neck Lift: Why They’re Often Done Together

A well-done lower facelift can sharpen the jawline, soften jowls, and restore midface support. A precise neck lift can refine the cervicomental angle and correct banding or fullness under the chin.
READ THE ARTICLE
The Science of Aging
February 5, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

Mini Facelift vs. Full Facelift: How to Choose the Right Procedure for You

A sharp jawline isn’t just an aesthetic ideal—it’s the visible result of how skin, fat, fascia, ligaments, and bone work together. With time, that system loses tension and volume.
READ THE ARTICLE
Facelift Recovery
February 3, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

Facelift Recovery Day by Day: Realistic Timelines and What to Expect

Choosing a facelift is both a beauty decision and a promise you make to your future self. The surgeon’s skill shapes the result—but your recovery determines when you get to see it.
READ THE ARTICLE
Best Age for a Facelift
February 2, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

What’s the Best Age for a Facelift? Follow the Clues in Your Skin and Anatomy

Picking the “right” age for a facelift isn’t about the number on your birthday cake—it’s about what your tissues can still do. Skin elasticity, the strength of your SMAS (the facial support layer)
READ THE ARTICLE
X
Welcome to our website