Skip to main content

Facelift and Neck Lift: Why They’re Often Done Together

A well-done lower facelift can sharpen the jawline, soften jowls, and restore midface support. A precise neck lift can refine the cervicomental angle and correct banding or fullness under the chin. But here’s the rub: the face and neck age together and behave like one aesthetic unit. Treat one and ignore the other, and you can end up with a mismatch—an elevated jawline over a lax neck, or a sleek neck beneath lingering jowls. That’s why surgeons so often combine a facelift and neck lift in one operation: the anatomy is connected, the aging changes are intertwined, and the techniques reinforce each other to create natural, longer-lasting results.
 
Below, we walk through the why, the how, who’s a good candidate, what to expect, and how recovery typically looks when these procedures are combined.

The Anatomical and Aesthetic Rationale for Combining Facelift and Neck Lift

Shared aging vectors: midface descent, jowl formation, and cervical laxity
 
Aging in the lower face and neck follows predictable lines of pull. As the midface descends and the malar retaining ligaments loosen, tissues drift downward. Fat pads deflate or fall, jowls appear along the mandible, and the platysma weakens—cue vertical neck bands and horizontal laxity. Gravity doesn’t care where we draw surgical borders: fix only the face and the neck laxity stands out; tighten only the neck and a softened jawline from jowls remains.
 
SMAS–platysma continuum and retaining ligaments as a unified system
 
The facial SMAS is continuous with the neck’s platysma. Both are tethered by retaining ligaments (zygomatic, mandibular, masseteric, cervical) that secure soft tissues to bone. Lift and re-suspend the SMAS without managing the platysma and you can get disharmony—or early relapse. Address the platysma without harmonizing the SMAS and residual jowling can linger. It’s one system—treat it like one.
 
Cervicomental angle, mandibular definition, and lower-face–neck harmony
 
That coveted, crisp cervicomental angle (roughly 105–120 degrees in women, slightly more obtuse in men) isn’t just about thinning the neck. It depends on a defined mandibular border and a smooth jaw-to-neck transition. Getting there usually requires coordinated repositioning of facial and neck soft tissues along carefully planned vectors.
 
Skin envelope, fat compartments, and skeletal support interplay
 
Skin elasticity, superficial and subplatysmal fat, and skeletal anatomy (chin projection, hyoid position) all shape the result. A recessed chin blunts the neck angle; prominent submandibular glands or a low hyoid can limit how sharp that angle can become. A combined approach lets the surgeon tailor maneuvers across the face–neck unit while respecting skin blood supply and deeper anatomic constraints.
Facelift and Neck Lift

Technique Synergy: How Combined Procedures Optimize Results

Deep-plane versus SMAS plication and their implications for the neck
 
Deep-plane facelifts release key ligaments and elevate the SMAS with the malar fat as a unit, allowing robust vertical and lateral repositioning with less skin tension. This often translates into a more effective lift of the jowl and perimandibular tissues—perfectly complementing neck work. SMAS plication or imbrication can be great for milder descent, but they rely more on thoughtful vector planning to avoid a lateral “sweep” or under-corrected neck. In both cases, coordinated platysma management is key.
 
Anterior and lateral platysmaplasty, subplatysmal fat, and digastric management
 
Platysma treatment is the backbone of neck refinement:
  • Anterior platysmaplasty (the “corset”) uses a small submental incision to suture the platysma edges together, correcting banding and sharpening the cervicomental angle.
  • Lateral platysma suspension anchors the muscle to fixed points (e.g., mastoid fascia), redraping the lateral neck and shifting tension off the skin.
  • Subplatysmal fat is reduced conservatively—enough to define, not hollow. In select cases, hypertrophic anterior digastric muscles can be conservatively debulked.
  • Submandibular glands are assessed pre-op; mild to moderate show can sometimes be camouflaged by platysma tightening, while marked prominence may call for targeted reduction by experienced surgeons. Every step respects vascularity and nerve pathways.
Incision design, vector planning, and tension distribution
 
Incisions are hidden in natural lines: within the temporal hairline, along the tragus (often retrotragal for camouflage), around the earlobe, and into the postauricular sulcus and occipital hairline. Vectors typically include:
  • A more vertical/superolateral vector for the midface and jowl.
  • A posterior-superior vector for the neck and lateral platysma to avoid bunching and ensure smooth redraping.
The real pull is placed on the deep layers—not the skin—to minimize scar widening and keep the hairline natural.
 
Sequencing the operation to maximize safety and efficiency
 
Sequencing varies, but the goal is the same: set the keystone, then harmonize the rest.
  • Many surgeons start with the neck through a submental incision to perform anterior platysmaplasty and subplatysmal work, laying the foundation for the lower face.
  • Others begin with the deep-plane dissection of the face, then complete the neck with lateral suspension.
Meticulous hemostasis is non-negotiable; tumescent infiltration and adjuncts like tranexamic acid can reduce bleeding. Throughout, perfusion is protected.

Patient Selection and Preoperative Evaluation

Photographic analysis, cephalometrics, and 3D surface assessment
 
Standardized high-resolution photos (frontal, oblique, lateral, submental) help assess jowls, the cervicomental angle, skin redundancy, and asymmetries. Cephalometric analysis and 3D imaging—when available—quantify vector needs and skeletal factors like chin projection and mandibular plane angle.
 
Skin quality, BMI, and comorbidity considerations
 
Skin elasticity, sun damage, and dermal thickness guide how much redraping is possible and whether resurfacing should be added. Higher BMI often means more subcutaneous and subplatysmal fat; poor metabolic health raises wound-healing and hematoma risks. Uncontrolled hypertension, tobacco use, and anticoagulation need optimization—or may be disqualifying.
 
Submandibular gland prominence, hyoid position, and chin projection
 
A full/ptotic submandibular gland, low hyoid, or microgenia can blunt the neck angle even after aggressive soft-tissue work. Spotting these pre-op allows for smart planning—chin augmentation for better projection, or clear guidance about realistic neck contours in low-hyoid anatomy.
 
Expectation setting, informed consent, and risk stratification
 
Patients should understand how face and neck results interplay, typical recovery milestones, when drains or compression may be used, and the limits imposed by their anatomy. Risk tools (e.g., the Caprini score for VTE) and a frank discussion of nerve injury, hematoma, seroma, and scar maturation keep expectations aligned with what surgery can safely deliver.
Facelift and Neck Lift

Outcomes, Durability, and Risk Mitigation

Longevity drivers and relapse patterns in the face–neck unit
 
Longevity hinges on robust release and re-suspension of the SMAS–platysma unit, thoughtful vectoring, and respect for retaining ligaments. Deep-plane techniques often hold midface and jowl improvements longer. The neck tends to relapse sooner—gravity and platysma dynamics are relentless. Stable weight, sun protection, and healthy habits help preserve results.
 
Avoiding nerve injury: marginal mandibular and great auricular protection
 
The marginal mandibular branch rides near the lower mandibular border, most vulnerable in front of the masseter. Staying in strict sub-SMAS or subplatysmal planes and using gentle retraction lowers risk. The great auricular nerve crosses the sternocleidomastoid near Erb’s point; preserving its posterior branch helps keep sensation in the earlobe and auricle. Surgeons also protect the cervical branch of the facial nerve during platysma work and the frontal branch during temporal dissection.
 
Hematoma, seroma, and skin necrosis prevention protocols
 
Hematoma is the most common early complication. Prevention playbook:
  • Control blood pressure pre-op; pause specific supplements/NSAIDs.
  • Ensure meticulous intraoperative hemostasis; use drains in higher-risk patients and apply compressive dressings.
  • Monitor blood pressure post-op and limit activity early on.
Seromas are minimized by choosing the right planes and limiting dead space. Skin viability is protected by avoiding excessive skin tension, maintaining good flap perfusion, and stopping smoking well in advance.
 
Scar placement, maturation timelines, and camouflage strategies
 
Thoughtful incision placement within hair-bearing areas and ear contours keeps scars discreet. Retrotragal incisions, beveled hairline cuts, and preserving the natural hairline are essential. Scars typically mature over 6–12 months; silicone therapy, sun avoidance, and—if needed—laser or microneedling improve the look. Minor revisions can be done once scars have settled.

Adjunctive Options and Perioperative Care Pathway

Neck liposuction, chin augmentation, and buccal fat considerations
  • Neck liposuction can be powerful for subcutaneous fat when the skin is elastic; it’s often paired with platysma work for clean contours.
  • Chin augmentation (implant or sliding genioplasty) can dramatically sharpen the cervicomental angle and jawline in patients with microgenia.
  • Buccal fat pad reduction? Use sparingly—over-resection can hollow the midface later. Many surgeons favor SMAS repositioning and conservative volumization instead of aggressive fat removal.
Energy-based tightening and injectables: when to stage versus combine
 
Energy devices (RF microneedling, ultrasound, plasma-based) can boost skin quality but are often staged to protect flap perfusion. Neurotoxins are useful after surgery for dynamic platysma bands or depressor anguli oris activity, while fillers or structural fat grafting are commonly combined with facelifts to restore deflated compartments. Resurfacing (laser, peels) is either staged or done conservatively at the time of surgery, depending on flap thickness and blood supply.
 
Anesthesia, perioperative antibiotics, and DVT prophylaxis
A combined facelift–neck lift can be done under general anesthesia or deep IV sedation with local infiltration—patient health and surgeon preference drive the choice. Standard care includes a single pre-incision antibiotic dose with limited postoperative dosing unless there’s a specific reason to extend. VTE prevention is risk-based: everyone gets early ambulation and mechanical prophylaxis; chemoprophylaxis is added when risk is higher and bleeding risk is acceptable.
 
Recovery milestones, activity restrictions, and maintenance plan
  • Day 0–2: Head elevated, cool compresses, controlled blood pressure. Drains (if placed) usually come out in 1–2 days.
  • Week 1: Ear-area sutures are removed; bruising and swelling start to fade. Light walking is good; avoid bending, straining, or heavy lifting.
  • Weeks 2–3: Many return to non-strenuous work. Makeup can cover residual bruising.
  • Weeks 4–6: Most swelling is gone; light exercise resumes if cleared.
  • Months 3–6: Final contours settle; scars soften and fade.
Long-term care: sun protection, consistent skincare, stable weight, and occasional nonsurgical touch-ups as needed.
Facelift and Neck Lift

Putting It All Together: A Practical Example

A 58-year-old presents with early malar descent, pronounced jowls, and moderate neck banding with submental fullness. On profile, the chin is mildly recessed, and the submandibular glands are faintly visible. Skin quality is fair with signs of photoaging.
 
A combined plan could include a deep-plane facelift to elevate the midface and jowl, lateral platysma suspension, limited anterior platysmaplasty to address banding, conservative subplatysmal fat contouring, and a small porous polyethylene chin implant for improved projection. Incisions are placed retrotragally and within the postauricular sulcus and occipital hairline. Tension is borne by the SMAS–platysma, not the skin. The patient is counseled that mild submandibular gland show may persist and that staged fractional laser resurfacing can improve skin quality after healing. The result? A harmonized jawline and neck with balanced, durable rejuvenation.

Conclusion

Facelift and neck lift are natural partners because the face–neck continuum ages as one and shares a common anatomic framework. By treating the SMAS–platysma system, redistributing tension along smart vectors, and tailoring maneuvers to each patient’s skeletal and soft-tissue realities, combined surgery often delivers more coherent—and longer-lasting—rejuvenation than either procedure on its own. The keys are thoughtful patient selection, meticulous technique, proactive risk management, and clear communication about goals and limits. For anyone seeking a sharper jawline, a refined neck, and a natural, “unoperated” look, the combined approach is often the most efficient, elegant path forward.
Proper incision care

Schedule Your Appointment 
with Dr. Mourad

If you are considering facial plastic surgery and want results that enhance your natural beauty without looking overdone, schedule a consultation with Dr. Moustafa Mourad today. You will receive personal, expert guidance at every step—from your first visit to your final result.

From Our Blog

The Science of Aging
February 5, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

Mini Facelift vs. Full Facelift: How to Choose the Right Procedure for You

A sharp jawline isn’t just an aesthetic ideal—it’s the visible result of how skin, fat, fascia, ligaments, and bone work together. With time, that system loses tension and volume.
READ THE ARTICLE
Facelift Recovery
February 3, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

Facelift Recovery Day by Day: Realistic Timelines and What to Expect

Choosing a facelift is both a beauty decision and a promise you make to your future self. The surgeon’s skill shapes the result—but your recovery determines when you get to see it.
READ THE ARTICLE
Best Age for a Facelift
February 2, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

What’s the Best Age for a Facelift? Follow the Clues in Your Skin and Anatomy

Picking the “right” age for a facelift isn’t about the number on your birthday cake—it’s about what your tissues can still do. Skin elasticity, the strength of your SMAS (the facial support layer)
READ THE ARTICLE
The Science of Aging
February 1, 2026 | Dr. Moustafa Mourad | Uncategorized

The Science of Aging: How Facial Ligaments Influence Sagging and Jawline Definition

A sharp jawline isn’t just an aesthetic ideal—it’s the visible result of how skin, fat, fascia, ligaments, and bone work together. With time, that system loses tension and volume.
READ THE ARTICLE
X
Welcome to our website